In this assignment, I wrote a technical description on a flashlight. After reviewing thispaper, I believe that my grade should be a 85. I believe I met the criteria for each category at ahigh success rate, however there are minor things that would deduct points. One thing I wouldget points in right away is the organization of the paper. The paper has every component neededin the correct order. It’s easy to follow and well structured. Each heading lets the reader knowwhere specific things are written. Along with making the paper organized, the written part ofeach section is also clear. The definition section clearly introduces the topic and describes what aflashlight is. It even gives background information surrounding the topic and dives deeper ratherthan just stating a regular definition. The components listed all the main parts of the flashlightbecause not all the flashlights have the same parts. And the explanation part of this sectionexplained each part and how it contributed to the function of the flashlight. Some sentences canfeel a bit repetitive in the explanations part, such as when talking about the power source and thelight source. The tone and language of this paper is good. It’s easy to understand and veryfactual. The use of words were very simple so it was easy for the reader to understand. Thereading is very clear and concise. Compared to the rough draft and the final draft, there is a bigimprovement. The final draft adds things that weren’t in the rough draft and it also fixes thingsthat were lacking. And also, in order for points to not be deducted, the writing was submitted ontime as well. One thing that would deduct points from this writing is the use of citations. Therewere no citations in this writing which would cause points to be lost. Without the use of citations,it wouldn’t be clear whether the information was from sources. Overall, after consideringeverything, this paper would get a 85. There would be points deducted on some things, butoverall everything was written well.